How many PR events happen every single day, filled with bloggers and journalists with their camera phones or their crappy entry level SLRs or point-and-shoot digicams, who will take photos of the products on display, TwitPic them, or post them somewhere on the web?
How can you deny access for a photographer - who will take photos that actually look good - but then allow people to take photos on whatever device they happen to bring with them?
Why are people so weird about photographs, when pretty much every single person walking around has a 2mpx camera or higher in their pocket?
Is the the big lens? Does it look more official and therefore more intrusive and then people start freaking out about lawsuits and model release forms and identity theft and privacy laws and NDAs and embargoes?!
What's the deal?
How many people show up to events, and then just bring their camera anyway?
Is that what I'm meant to do? I always thought I was doing the right thing by always asking permission before I bring round a dude with a massive lens - but maybe I need to make like the rest of the world and be a dick about it? Just assume that it's OK and waltz in?
Aside from quality and lens size, what's the difference between me bringing along someone who actually knows how to take photos, or a journo showing up with their Canon 5D slung around their neck?
Boggles the mind. You'd think - unless it was a super secret launch that was embargoed until the end of time - that people would gladly accept the presence of a photographer. To make their event look fun. To make their products look fab. To give the impression that their launch was the most exciting thing ever. Look at those smiling face! Look how much people are loving your silly little canapés!
Can someone explain this to me? Because I'm starting to find it really frustrating.
Image via Kevin Dooley's Flickr
Recent Comments